Session Three: Week 30

We have just four days left in our Indiegogo campaign, and only $780 to go! Please donate if you can to support this work, and please share the campaign widely! We can do this with your support. Thank you.  

Tuesday

Written by Molly

Since they had seen the 1960s film version of Romeo and Juliet the previous Tuesday, the women had taken some time to mull over the film before meeting for this session. They were able to think critically about what they wanted to adopt from the movie and what they preferred to do differently. After briefly going through the Paris, Friar Laurence and Juliet scene in order to give the woman playing Paris more time on stage, the women wanted to try to tackle the last scene of the play, which hasn’t been touched too much so far.

They were torn about whether or not to cut out the first part of the scene, where Paris confronts Romeo, as that scene is not in the film and is a popular cut for many productions. Some seemed to find the scene unnecessary and forgettable (as one woman put it, “Paris dies?!”) The women are always eager to trim down scenes in order to make them more manageable, but they are also always considerate of the person playing the part. After some discussion, we decided to cut a little bit but leave the majority of the scene. The scene helps to flesh out Paris’s character and make the Romeo and Juliet love story narrative less neat and more complex, showing the other people directly affected by their actions. The women playing Juliet liked the detail that Paris was bringing flowers to Juliet’s grave and was reluctant to take it out. Furthermore, the women realized that some aspects of the beginning of the scene were important, as there needs to be a reason for the characters to gather at the tomb at the end of the play.

We still struggle a bit with poor attendance, which makes it difficult to work some scenes that need rehearsal. It would be ideal to have everyone there, but the specific circumstances of trying to do drama in a prison make that very difficult if not impossible. Still, the women who are there are driven and enthusiastic, and there are women who cannot come all the time who are still very serious about Shakespeare. The women seem a little anxious about being able to pull this off at the end of June. But it is clear to me that they are motivated and work hard on their parts, and I have no doubt that they’ll be able to put on a good show! They clearly know more of the play than they think they do, and if they just keep working at it, they should be able to create a product that will make them all proud.

We also welcomed Jamie, a new volunteer, to the group. She will definitely be a welcome addition!

Thursday

Today we worked on Act IV Scenes III and V, in which Juliet takes the potion and is found “dead.” We have made many cuts to these scenes, and we kept cutting, finding what we needed to tell the story and make things work for our characters, and what was superfluous.

Our staging felt “crowded” at first, but we realized that it worked in terms of the inherent competition between the Nurse and Lady Capulet, and the chaos of finding Juliet unresponsive. As I have been cast as Friar Laurence, I took a bit of a backseat in “directing” the scene, and the women solved all of the problems we encountered with Sarah’s guidance. They have a deep grasp of the emotional impact such a discovery would have on their characters, and they had no qualms about diving right in.

We were initially hesitant to use the curtain at all, as the we all feel that it may disrupt the flow of the play and give the audience an opportunity to lose focus, but we decided as a group to close the curtain at the end of this scene – otherwise, it will be awkward getting Juliet off stage. Someone came up with the wonderful idea, then, to play the next scene, in which Balthasar tells Romeo of Juliet’s death, in front of the curtain. This will solve both our problem of exiting and of losing focus in one fell swoop.

Another wonderful idea that one of the women had was for Tybalt to actually roam the auditorium at the end of Juliet’s monologue, thus giving her a boost in her vision of Tybalt’s ghost seeking Romeo, and her decision to drink the potion. It is an eerie way to stage this, and effective for the actress.

The deeper we get into our process, the more creative the women become, and the more empowered they are to make this play their own. Ruthlessly cutting lines and parts of scenes that we do not need, while perhaps not scholarly, is completely in keeping with our goal of simply telling a story – our version of this story as written by Shakespeare. Putting a ghost in the audience is a fabulous solution to a very difficult passage, and using the curtain to keep the story going rather than simply relying on it to mask a scene change is likewise a decision rooted in the ensemble’s understanding of this play.

And all of these decisions are being made as a group – one of the women smiled and said, “I love this group,” as we unanimously agreed to cut a large part of one of the scenes while keeping the pieces of it that are meaningful to individual actors.

Session Three: Week 29

We have thirteen days left to raise $3,890 for Shakespeare in Prison. We can't do it without you. Please consider a donation, a share, or both, to keep this important work going.

We spent this week watching the 1968 film version of Romeo & Juliet. I had been opposed to watching the film early on in our process, since that tends to give people an idea of how characters “should” be played, and we wanted to find our own interpretations. But the majority still wanted to watch it at this point, so we did.

It turns out that this was actually a really good point in the process to do this. The women all a deep enough understanding of the play and their characters to resist the temptation to “copy” the actors in the film, while pulling some good ideas from this adaptation. The woman playing the Nurse, for instance, said she had some different ideas about her character. She likes some of her ideas better than what she saw, but certain scenes seem to work better with another interpretation. She’s mulling it over.

At times the film felt a bit like a sing-along, with one or more of us speaking lines at the same time as the actors on screen. That was fun, and it became even more apparent how well the group knows the play.

We got into a discussion after we finished the film about which character bears the most responsibility. One woman feels that the parents bear the most blame, since the feud originates with them. Others feel that the burden lies on Friar Laurence – the marriage and subsequent events could not have happened without him, and he repeatedly takes a less than direct route to try to achieve a goal. “Why didn’t he deliver the note himself if it was so important?” one woman asked. That said, none of his conspiracies happen without the feud in the first place. “How the most impulsive people ever all found each other is beyond me,” said one woman. We talked a bit about mob mentality as well, and how the smallest argument can blow up into a huge conflict (i.e., the fight between Tybalt and Mercutio).

We also were very interested in the cuts that we had made vs. the cuts in the film. While some of the cuts in the film adaptation are not ones we feel we can make, since our storytelling medium is so different, there are other cuts that we actually liked. We all realized that the scene between Capulet, Paris, and Lady Capulet is not really necessary. Those of us who were present have no qualms about cutting it, but since the women playing two of those roles were at other programs, we are waiting to make the final decision until we discuss it with them.

All in all, we were all glad that we came to this compromise of watching the film midway through our process. The women agreed with me that, had we watched it very early on, it would have hampered their creativity, but they also proved to me that it can be a useful tool once we are solid in our own unique interpretation of the play.

Session Three: Week 28

Tuesday  

Although tonight we had very light attendance (this is a recurring issue that we are working on addressing, believe me!), some very deep work was done by the women who were present.

I had a chat with the woman playing Lady Capulet about her character just after we walked in. She identifies deeply with Lady Capulet – this woman comes from a family where “expressing affection is expressing weakness,” and, having grown up in that environment, she has struggled to be affectionate with her own child while working against that conditioning. She does not feel that she has always been successful, and she feels that struggle in Lady Capulet as well. Complicating matters for Lady Capulet is a lack of agency – no matter how she might feel about Juliet’s situation, she will always capitulate to her husband for fear of abuse, as this participant discovered in a prior rehearsal.

We also had a good discussion about avoiding emotional “substitution” and instead drawing on past experiences to inform our acting without reliving trauma. We discussed “as if” situations (i.e., it’s as if my own child had been killed when Tybalt dies) and ways of making things physical instead of intellectual (i.e., when I went through this awful experience, I was disoriented, like a zombie – drawing on that, I will imagine that I am moving through fog in this scene). While drawing parallels between Shakespeare’s work and our own lives is important to the work we do, re-opening painful wounds for the sake of acting is dangerous, and we must take care when we revisit those experiences while telling this story.

After talking for quite awhile, we gave Lady Capulet an opportunity to try some different things with the scene just after Tybalt and Mercutio are killed. Clearly she’s upset – but what does she do physically with those emotions? We determined that she should not get in the Prince’s face when demanding justice – it worked better when she stayed on the ground. Being rooted in the language is beginning to do the work for the actress in this scene.

We then worked on Juliet’s “Gallop apace…” monologue, which has been cut down quite a bit for the sake of time and not overwhelming the participant. She does not like the first part of this piece, but she gave Dominique a chance to “make a case” for it. After Dominique explained the poetry a bit, the importance of its tone at this point in the play and for Juliet, the participant tried it. It began to work better for her, but when it really took off was when I took her script, sat behind her, and read each line softly to her, allowing her to “drop in” to the text without having to read it. Although I couldn’t see her face, her voice was much more connected, and those who were in the audience were very excited about what they both saw and heard. The participant is now more enthusiastic about the piece, to the extent that she is going to take a look at the previous version of the script to see if she wants to put back in anything that we’ve cut.

Thursday

After Sarah led a great exercise about objectives and tactics, we worked on the first scene of the play. We finalized some cuts, eliminating three out of four parents from the scene so that Lady Capulet and Capulet can double as Abraham and Sampson. Our Balthasar is still with us, and I have been cast as Gregory. With that, we worked the scene for pacing and tone. The Prince is making great progress, becoming more imposing, slowing down, increasing the power she has on stage. The scene is beginning to work very well. We just need to choreograph our fight with the foam swords!

We then moved to Act V Scene I, in which Balthasar tells Romeo that Juliet is dead, and Romeo goes to the Apothecary. Our Balthasar has some stage fright, but she is determined to get past it. Her interpretation of the scene is that Balthasar does not want to give Romeo this news, but he has to. As such, she found that it works to avoid eye contact with him until he gets upset. Romeo got to a point today where she has begun to truly feel the loss and desperation, although she needs to dig deeper to motivate Balathasar’s lines about her. She has begun to vocalize without words, which is a big step for any actor – we tend to be very intimidated by our own voices when they are on the primal side, and it’s exciting to watch her progress.

We finished up the day by solidifying that Matthew will play Mercutio, I will play Friar Laurence, and our new volunteer (who will join the group next week!) will take on some of the more minor roles. It seemed like a relief to everyone to know who will be playing those roles. Now I’ve got some lines to memorize!

Session Three: Week 27

Tuesday  

We found out today that we have lost three of our members, one due to schedule conflicts and two others due to their being on sanction (this means that they are unable to attend the group, have too many unexcused absences, and can no longer participate). So we hunkered down as a group to discuss our options. After much discussion, we decided that it is too late in the game to continue adding people – especially since we never know whether folks will stick around and commit or not. The path of least resistance at this point is to rely on the ensemble we have, most of whom have been with the group since October. This includes the facilitators – so it looks like the three of us who can be at every performance will be taking on a role or two each.

While the goal of the program is for the inmates to take ownership of the group, the material, and their performance, I feel that we are still within the bounds of the goals we set by plugging in facilitators at this point. The women who are still with the group have been working diligently on the parts to which they committed months ago; lines are beginning to be memorized, and their understandings of their characters deepen with each rehearsal. For them to be penalized by others’ lack of commitment – to have to abandon these characters now to pick up the slack elsewhere, or to add to their loads with verbose characters like Mercutio and Friar Laurence – will engender stress, not empowerment. And we facilitators, by committing fully to the parts, becoming more integrated in the ensemble, and providing an environment in which the women can continue toward their own personal goals, can stay in keeping with Shakespeare in Prison’s objectives even as we step onto the stage ourselves.

All that decided, we dove into the “party scene,” which the women had been working on individually for the past week. It is mostly off book and has shown a LOT of growth. The woman playing Capulet, who has had a difficult time accessing the character’s aggression and “manliness”, became much more forceful and boisterous. She was still uncomfortable delivering her opening monologue on the stage, so we moved her into the house, where she can directly address the audience. This is much more interesting for her, and the speech took off. She noted that she had an easier time railing against Tybalt with Matt reading the role, as the woman who plays that character is still finding her way into the character. We discussed the give and take between actors; that the more she gives Tybalt, the more Tybalt will give her.

The woman playing Lady Capulet mentioned that she wasn’t sure what to do in this scene; she has found her way over to the Capulet/Tybalt argument, which feels right, but she’s not sure where to go once they both exit. Lady Capulet’s loyalties, she feels, are divided between her lover and her abusive husband. We ran the scene twice more to give her an opportunity to explore both ways playing the scene. I encouraged her to take a moment or two to make her decision. When we ran it the first time, she sadly exited after Capulet, and this ended up being what felt right to her. She feels that Lady Capulet is just too cowed by the abuse to do anything else – it’s not what the character actually wants, but she’s too afraid of the repercussions to follow her heart. This informs the rest of the play for her as well.

The group seemed empowered by our decision to be self-reliant, and by the enormous growth in the scene we worked tonight. I am encouraged that, even with all of the frustrations, no one yet has said, “Maybe we should cancel the performance.” They set a goal, and they are determined to meet it.

Thursday

Written by Sarah

We began the rehearsal with a warm up and a discussion of the paint needed for the sets.  Our Capulet pointed out that if we get the primary colors and white we can make any colors we need.  The cast was also very excited to share that there will be a balcony built for the show.

We then got down to work rehearsing.  We got so much done.  The cast members have been soaking up their roles and working hard on objectives.  It shows in their work, which is deepening and strengthening each week!

We began working on the Capulet/Montague face-off in Act I.  Staging the scene and making sure that everyone knew what they wanted and needed in their characters.  The cast built on the facilitator's suggested blocking to find the humor and the danger in the scene.

We worked on the Apothecary/Romeo scene, putting Romeo back in, as she had to miss the last rehearsal when we worked it.  The actors found strong objectives and the cast provided great encouragement and direction to them.

We then moved on to the top of the party scene when Capulet welcomes guests through to the argument with between Capulet and Tybalt.  In this scene Tybalt discovered the power of stillness.  When she stopped trying to be on the move and allowed Tybalt to stay in one spot, she discovered the power she could emanate with just Shakespeare's language.  Capulet had so much to react to and work with, with Tybalt's new-found quiet strength, and the sparks flew between the two.

Finally we worked on the Romeo and Juliet bedroom scene (the lark and nightingale scene).  This was an extraordinary experience, and our Capulet took the helm as director and mined the scene for all its humor.  She asked Romeo to be DOING something physically throughout the scene (taking shoes off, getting back in bed, etc...) There was a smooth and exciting collaborative spirit in the room that allowed everyone to do their best work.

The cast has really embraced the use of objectives and tactics, and I promised to do a great objectives and tactics exercise at the top of rehearsal this week.  We closed knowing we had made strong progress and worked very well together.

Our Indiegogo campaign has been pretty quiet this past week... Can you help us by sharing the campaign? Thank you so much.

Session Three: Week 26

Tuesday  

Written by Molly

After getting through the gate a little late, I walked in to find the women playing Juliet, Romeo, Capulet, Lady Capulet and the Nurse rehearsing Act III, scene V -- from memory! This complicated scene begins with pillow talk between Romeo and Juliet (famously including the “it was the lark” and “it was the nightingale” banter) and ends with Juliet being admonished and threatened by her parents and abandoned by the Nurse. It was clear that each of them had spent a lot of time over the past week committing their lines to memory. Their dedication and commitment were impressive and they probably only need to spend a little bit more time on that scene before they are entirely off-book.

In memorizing this scene, the women hoped to show the other participants in the group what the play might look like when it is more polished. Unfortunately, attendance was a little low on this Tuesday, so hopefully they will be able to show their fellow actors their accomplishment in the future and it will serve as a motivating factor. The women realized that being off book allowed for greater potential for movement and dramatic choices. They seemed eager and somewhat antsy to have this scene completely memorized, without calling for lines, so they could really intensify blocking choices and amp up their acting.

These five actors are making interesting dramatic choices and it is a joy to see how they are developing each of their characters. For instance, there are many ways that the actor playing Lady Capulet could play this scene – as an obedient wife blindly supporting her husband, as a cold woman whose only wish for her daughter is to find a good match. The woman playing Lady Capulet is both thirsty for revenge against Romeo and somewhat of a battered wife, fearful of what her volatile husband might do. It is fascinating to see how these women are identifying with their characters and how they are transforming them into multidimensional, complex people as they take the stage.

For next time, they decided on their own to try to memorize the party scene from Act I, scene V. It is really impressive how motivated they seem to be, which portends well for the actual performances. The play is really coming along!

Thursday

Although attendance was again light today, those of us who were present were very productive!

We began by noting that the role of Apothecary was still vacant, and one of the newer members of the group, who is already committed to Lady Montague and Page, decided she would give it a try, since we’ve edited the scene quite a bit, and it isn’t a large number of lines. We used the door to the right of the stage as the Apothecary’s front door, and we worked with each character’s objectives and tactics. Perhaps the Apothecary is a woman with starving children to feed (we know from the text that this character is very poor). The actress playing this part experimented with her reaction to the amount of money Romeo offers, inserting the phrase, “Oh my god…” Sarah encouraged her to work with that phrase for now, but eventually to put all of that emotion into Shakespeare’s words instead.

We moved on to Act IV Scene II, which is brief and deceptively simple. We found that it is not, in fact, simple at all, as we continued to work with objectives and tactics. Juliet needs Capulet to believe her – this is her primary objective. But what about Capulet? We asked the woman playing this part if he is surprised by Juliet’s coming around. She decided that he is not – he is used to getting his way, and he’s proud of her for seeing the light.

We then went through and cut a whole bunch of lines that are not working for the women and are not necessary to the plot. The more comfortable and confident they become, the more ownership they take, and that includes being confident enough to know what the play needs and what can probably go.

There are 33 days left in our Indiegogo campaign! We've got $4,500 left to raise in that time to meet our goal. Please consider supporting our work by making a donation of ANY size, or simply by spreading the word! Thank you.